NEWSLETTER

THANKS AGAIN FOR YOUR VISIT TO  WWW.HDLEWISENTERPRISES.COM 

   CALL US TODAY at FAIRNESS INSTITUTE 302-559-4074

______________________________________________________

GRACIAS NUEVAMENTE POR SU VISITA, LLÁMENOS HOY MISMO. HÁGASE MIEMBRO ACTIVO/A DEL HDLEWISENTERPRISESLLC.COM INSTITUTO DE IMPARCIALIDAD. PÓNGASE EN CONTACTO HOY MISMO CON NOSOTROS.
_____________________________________________________
WWW.HDLEWISENTERPRISES.COM FAIRNESS INSTITUTE: CONSULTING AND TRAINING FOR FAIR AND IMPROVED PRODUCTIVITY


NEWSLETTER/DISCUSSION

The intent of this segment is to provide the reader with a discussion of diversity and fairness issues. We invite your suggestions, comments; and we thank you for your patience. Topics in this issue include "Preliminary Discussion/Comments on Personal Issues," "Neighborhood School Law," "School Accountability," and a model for fair employment. The key to the success of this model is the consistent review of workplace practices. These items were written on or around November 2001 to present.

Become an active member of the HDLEWISENTERPRISES.COM. Fairness Institute by calling or sending an email to horaciolewis18@gmail.com  expressing your willingness to do so. Membership will allow you to enter the title "The Fairness Institute" in your resume and related records. This registration will also include this fresh daily updated newsletter, copies (at reduced cost) of any publication written by Horacio Lewis (See “Publications” page in this site) and preliminary suggestions, by phone, on fairness issues. Organizations needing on-site fairness consultation and training should contact Horacio Lewis directly for a free evaluation. A fee will be assessed for actual on site training and consulting. Members are expected to be active participants in fairness issues and report to the Fairness Institute issues of fairness (or lack of) in their respective geographical areas. Said information will be shared on this page as appropriate.

__________________________________________________________
En Español

Para ser miembro activo/a del HORACIOLEWIS.COM INSTITUTO DE IMPARCIALIDAD (HORACIOLEWIS.COM FAIRNESS INSTITUTE), llame o mande un recado por correo electrónico indicando su interés. Un miembro activa/o puede incluir el título de esta organización en su resumen u hoja académica. Un miembro activo/a también conseguirá esta hoja de noticia analítica de imparcialidad puesta al día diariamente, consultación preliminar gratis sobre asuntos de imparcialidad y copias (a un descuento) de cualquiera publicación de Horacio Lewis (vea la página de publicaciones--“Publications and Contact Information"--en este sitio de Web). Organizaciones necesitando ayuda profesional en su sitio de empleo, deben llamar a Horacio Lewis directamente para una evaluación e información sobre el costo de matrícula para entrenamiento y consulta.
__________________________________________________________
HEADLINES:1.  I have today (4/5/09) announced my candidacy for a School Board position with the Christina School District (See Home Page, this site).  Please vote for me on May 12, 2009.  Gracias.

2. I am deeply troubled by today's (4/27/06) News Journal article on the robbery perpetrated by the Christina School District (I worked for them for over 7 years). The School Board and former Superintendent Wise, have a lot of accounting to do. Indeed, the School Board needs to explain to the community it represents why it gave Superintendent Wise a huge raise just before he jumped ship; and Superintendent Wise ought to be subpoenaed to return and explain to the public what he did or didn't do following the previous referendum. In fact, he should be asked to return the raise he received prior to leaving, which in retrospect, is something he intended to do (to leave, that is) from the get-go.

I ask the Christina community, of which I am a part, not to give a dime to any future referendum unless we have a full accounting of what is to be done and how and why. This would then be followed-up by monthly updates. We can begin to address the current deficit by firing all current school district administrators and dismissing the current School Board. We may exclude the new Superintendent from this house cleaning and allow her an opportunity to make things right. We have been had by former Superintendent Wise! He is the main reason why I left the district.

3. Undocumented Latinos have been the modern day slaves in the U.S. for much too long. They should be granted United States citizenship within two years providing they can show they have not otherwise violated our laws and are able to pay a fine of $2,000 for their "illegal" status. From here on, we should better secure our borders and enforce our immigration laws. It should be noted that many Mexicans believe they are not here illegally; since, prior to 1848, the southwest was the northern half of Mexico. Indeed, this was their home--Aztlán--before the Mayflower. They were born here! And Spanish/native American languages were the original idioms of this country. (April, 2006)

4. The Fairness Institute will be conducting a series of training programs (locations, registration fees and dates to be announced) on a variety of topics. On-site consulting and presentations are also available upon request. See Home Page for all relevant information. Coming soon: "Learn Conversational English for the Workplace," and "Making Diversity Work."

5. I fully support the position taken by Al Mascitti in his Wilmington Charter School piece in today's News Journal Papers. Those who challenge Dr. Ron Russo's innovative approach to educating our finest students are opting for an unfair educational system which only addresses the needs of the less motivated and less able. Indeed, we have spent an inordinate amount of public funds and time responding to the needs of all but the higher achieving students. As an educator for more years than you need to know here, I have worked for underachieving students, doing very little for the highly motivated who wallow and get lost in the morass of cooperative learning.

I'm happy that there is a Wilmington Charter that looks out for students who would otherwise be abused in classrooms which ignore their unique needs, and penalize their academic ability. I understand how the notion of having more Wilmington Charters would terrify a legislature or a Department of Education. What would there be to do with education? How then would they spend their time and money? What would then become of the ill-advised DSTP and those who justify their employment by making sure mediocrity reigns, fairness is selective and some are left behind. (3/2006)

6. Attorney General Carl C. Danberg in a letter dated April 6, 2006 has agreed to review relevant statutory and case law regarding Charter School of Wilmington admission policy, pursuant to my request as a parent, educator and President of the Fairness Institute. His previous Opinion (See News Journal, Friday, April 14, 2006) allows Charter to continue to administer an admission test, saying that the admission criteria is up to educators. I await a response to my own request.

7. The panel of “of out-of-state” experts created by Governor Ruth Ann Minner to study the impact of Delaware’s three-tiered high school diploma was yet another effort in futility. Said panel, saying it was a policy issue, came up with no specific recommendation. On this page (Please refer to extensive discussion below.), for several years, I have complained about the disparate impact of State testing and its corollary baseless three-tiered (i.e. outstanding, standard and basic) diploma rationalization. If the state wishes to indicate test results on the students' transcripts, that’s as far as it should go. "With distinction" should be noted only on diplomas and transcripts of those who do well academically as indicated by their actual overall course grade averages.

We do not need another education panel to lead us astray just to justify the jobs of the idle and political opportunists. Let us leave well enough alone and stop the nonsense once and for all. Again I say, get rid of the useless State tests and get back to basics. Let the classwork of teachers and students count for something! And in the end, a college admissions officer is more concerned with the G.P.A. and SAT/ACT scores anyway. The way to put an end to these persistent, unfair issues is to rise up as parents with appropriate litigation. Please write me with your comments (see email link above) on this issue or any other issues on this page.(3/2005)

8. I was disappointed in the pettiness displayed by the Delaware News Journal in not providing coverage on its front page to announce the passing of the late Dr. William “Willie” B. Keene. The political and partisan driven News Journal neglected its unbiased duty when it relegated a secondary page to celebrate the life and honor the death of this fine educator and human being. The Journal’s blind support for the failed policies of the State Superintendent who succeeded Keene, in a bloodless coup, should have been able to stand back and look at the larger picture of Dr. Keene’s contribution to our state versus hired gun Pat Forgione who came in, wrecked our educational system, was “fired” and quickly left to continue his ill informed education campaign in yet another unsuspecting educational bureaucracy. Let us all remember that Dr. Keene gave his entire life to education and serving the people of Delaware. He was a positive and encouraging soul who strongly believed in the power of education, discussion and conciliation. He will be sorely missed. (4/2004)

9. I humbly salute Jerry Rehberg who also passed recently. A Delaware music education leader, band director and writer of songs, Mr. Rehberg was a genuine inspiration to all his students, including my daughter. (4/2004)


PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION/COMMENTS--unedited random ramblings:

On death and dying, I opt to be cremated. Ashes, after salvageable harvesting, may be spread over moderate/warm climate area (San Diego?). It is much less expensive than the alternative, and my children can best use the money saved. In the event of illness, I request no heroic measures.

If I were to obtain a significant amount of money, rather than donate blindly to "charity" and the accompanying overhead, I would do my homework and find and donate to specific programs or people who can use some help. I do not require much and my needs are simple and basic. One of my life goals is to give away as much as possible to those who are in need.

I also seek peace and therefore, I am against any war with Iraq or whomever. I believe in stem-cell research for the purpose of saving or improving life. I am against human cloning although I believe it is inevitable. I believe abortion is a personal issue.

I urge everyone to read as much as possible and never stop learning or helping others in need. I urge students to strive to argue the other side of their point as vehemently as they would argue their own position. This helps to open a window of understanding and compassion for opposing views.

Have psychologists applied the switch that urges sex to a comparable one that could call up the warrior T cells for human healing?

Marriage is good for some, for others not. Married individuals try to fashion each other in their own image and take each other for granted. Or at least one does. Baggage from past life is controllingly and/or unwittingly applied to the marriage. What a drag. I say, think about the whole institution of marriage carefully before you get into it. If there are any doubts, and there should be, stay clear of it. In any event, once in it, within the first five years, if not earlier, take a hiatus to reflect on the marriage, make corrections and make applicable decisions.

I support affirmative action activities designed to repair a wrong or improve civilization. I am against unearned or contrived affirmative action. In a larger context, there are many forms of affirmative action, some legitimate others questionable. President Bush, for example, is on record against affirmative action for disenfranchised underrepresented populations, although he, himself, benefited from unearned affirmative action. His name recognition, background and money allowed him to affirmatively enroll and graduate from Yale University, though he was, admittedly, a "C" student.

There are religious/political belief affirmative action programs, disability affirmative action, savant affirmative action, situational affirmative action, age affirmative action, appearance affirmative action, weight affirmative action, heterosexual affirmative action, acquaintance affirmative action, background affirmative action, school recognition affirmative action, gender affirmative action, geographic affirmative action, military veteran affirmative action, philanthropic affirmative action, alumni family affirmative action, etc. etc.

In all the arguments on affirmative action, I have heard little, if any, discussion on undeserved "white privilege." The "rapper-philosopher" Eminem and others caution: "Let's say what we mean and mean what we say."

Sometimes affirmative action gets pretty hilarious. For example, I remember some of my employers listing me in two categories ("Hispanic" and "Black") for reporting purposes. See, because I am a Latino (we come in all colors), the unsuspecting person wouldn't know the difference, and the employer comes out looking like the "policies" are being observed. Now, if this had resulted in me being counted twice for salary purposes, then we would really have something meaningful to discuss. Does this all mean that if I moved to Alaska I would qualify as an Inuit as well?

The games we play with affirmative action...anything to get around doing the right thing, which is to hire qualified people from diverse backgrounds. Of course, this presumes "color blindness" which we certainly are not! Moreover, this also incorrectly presumes the end of racism, stereotyping and other forms of bias.

Then again we have the issue of being "qualified." In all my years of working in the areas of civil rights and diversity, I have never heard anyone ask for a "qualified" white for employment. The question then becomes: Are we recruiting qualified non-whites, whereas, whites don't have to be necessarily qualified? Is there a Freudian slip in our affirmative action rhetoric? I say, we will be approaching fairness when non-whites can be as mediocre as anyone else.

Former President Bill Clinton benefited from college draft deferment affirmative action, and Justice Clarence Thomas benefited from "minority status" affirmative action. The "stereotyping" of affirmative action troubles me. I say, let's try some affirmative fairness for a change.

If you are white, ask yourself the following questions and reflect on your answers:

Am I against affirmative action that focuses on correcting racial disparity? [If no, you needn't read any further; if yes,] Did I ever protest or do anything to correct the overrepresentation of whites in jobs, schools etc., even though I was aware of deliberate or unconscious exclusions of non-whites on the basis of race? Why am I all of a sudden against racial inclusion when I wasn't before as a beneficiary?

Why am I arguing for equality now if I didn't before when non-whites were excluded on the basis of race? Or rather, am I really for racial equity? Why is affirmative action based on race unfair now? Why wasn't it unfair when I benefited and others didn't? Am I still a beneficiary of white-race affirmative action? Would I rather live at a time when the work place and school place were bastions of white male chauvinism? If these are not your questions/issues, then I can understand and appreciate your opposition to affirmative action based on race. However, can you understand those who support affirmative action?

We holler qualifications, but let’s look at the facts: If you are not white, that is, if you are non-white, it’s a quadrangulated situation. You don’t get the position because you are black or you get the position because you are black. In either case, whites, by and large, control your fate.

I search for an America that seeks fairness for all its citizens, regardless of race; an America that prizes ability and character over race. An America which understands, values and promotes diversity. This is my wish, this is my quest. Until then, I support some sort of equity process which is inclusive of all our citizens.

The recent United States Supreme Court decision regarding the University of Michigan Law School admissions policy (Grutter v. Bollinger) is on the right track. Diversity should, indeed, be a factor ["factor" must be distinguishable from "quota"] in the admissions process. This would also apply to employment and related selection criteria.

As for the Delaware State Testing Program (DSTP--see more below), I am convinced it is a Delaware News Journal Papers political campaign and a Delaware Department of Education "jobs" project. Just how student-learning fits into this quagmire is anybody's guess. Clearly, if we spent more time talking about student behavior, or rather, misbehavior in class, and its effect on teaching and learning, this entire DSTP charade would be null and void.

In the upcoming presidential election, only a candidate Hillary Clinton may add excitement to the event. As for me, I usually vote for my write-in candidates. In the past I have voted for my children, friends, people I admire and family members for positions as diverse as County Executive, Sheriff, Governor and President. I am rarely impressed by our candidates and political system. Yet, I exercise my unique opportunity to vote every year.

Now that Latinos are the largest "minority" group in the country, everyone wants a piece of the action. Latinos, the ones who have done everything under the sun, the work many other Americans have rejected (e.g. stoop labor), to make life better for the "haves," have been treated like shit and still are. Though here, along with other natives, before the Mayflower arrived, they continue to be the modern day slaves of this country. Will their new status improve their plight? This remains to be seen.

Just the other day, I was invited by the Delaware News Journal to meet with them to discuss Latino issues in our State of Delaware. I flatly refused. I am tired of doing other people's work. Indeed, if they had enough Latinos in their employ, they would not need a token meeting. Are they just realizing that their coverage/reporting has been biased against Latinos?

Are they now realizing that they have excluded Latinos in many articles? Are they just now realizing that they have no clue regarding Latino culture and language--will they finally begin a crash course in Spanish in order to attempt to communicate with a long neglected disenfranchised community? What's the deal? What's in it for Latinos? I did ask the caller how many Latinos worked for the Journal. More than five?, I asked; she didn't know. Maybe that's the place to start. Hire enough Latinos, then conduct meetings with them on coverage needs...

Speaking of coverage, when will the Journal report on our State budget vis a vis our casino revenues and "rainy day" funds in light of our financial drought?

Sometime ago I rushed back from a commitment I had in Maryland to speak at a minority issues conference in Delaware. I was asked to address conditions of Latinos. Well, as it turned out, I never got to speak. Conference organizers forgot that I was on the program (or maybe they just ran out of time). I viewed this as a personal insult and an insult to the Latino community. Will this type of treatment recur now that Latinos are the largest minority? Does it really matter?

The fact that the U.S. has been the 4th largest Spanish speaking country in the world has only resulted in the alienation of the Spanish language and its 40+ million Latinoestadounidenses. [I coined this word along with Unitedstatesians, in 1973 when I was developing academic programs for Indiana University in Bloomington, Indiana. If Webster can do it, so can I.]

When you get down to it, what you see is a country which is language phobic. Most of the world speaks more than one language except the "great" United States of America which prefers to start language study at the secondary school level instead of in elementary schools where language would be best learned. Language study is not even a requirement in high school unless you are interested in getting into a good college. Then only two years are mandatory--hardly enough for fluency.

On the contrary, when I was a youngster growing up in La República de Panamá, English was required from Kindergarten through university levels. Indeed there is more linguistic illiteracy in the U.S. than in most developing countries. There is even a joke which has been in existence for some time across the world.

What do you call a person who speaks more than one language?: "multilingual" or "bilingual" or "polyglot."

What do you call a person who speaks one language?: "an American."

We have lost wars because of language incompetence. When will we get serious about other languages?

When will we realize that Latinos may be an answer to our racial paranoia, a bridge to ethnic harmony? They are mixed with everything under the sun ("grifos," "trigueños...") even if some Latinos themselves don't admit it--¿Y dónde está tu abuela? El que no tiene de Inga tiene de Mandingo.

The Columbia Shuttle astronauts went into space looking for a road to heaven for humankind. They found it, and were invited back; this time to stay.

What's up with some athletic coaches? Many use intimidation and personal attacks/abusive methods. Kids stay because of the love of the game (when allowed to play) and camaraderie. But they pay a deep price in their hearts and souls. Those who quit to end the abuse, seldom regain their self confidence, and lose much of their game skills. Many abandon their sport. What a shame, what a waste.

Who is looking after these kids? Why do sport/school administrators allow this to happen? I have complained, to no avail. I have encountered at least two such coaches in our public schools. I am sure there are many others. My children have been victimized by such coaches. Who do they think they are anyway?, to take such liberty with other people's children. If I were not a man of peace, I would have committed battery long ago. Athletic coaches working with youngsters should be better screened and trained. When found wanting, they should be dismissed and barred from working with school children. Don't get me wrong. I have also had the privilege to meet and work with wonderful coaches who serve as true role models for our youngsters.

And what about teachers and other instructors who do not recuse themselves when judging contests/auditions or making awards to groups of students that include members of their family? This is also an issue of some importance in our schools and elsewhere. I have also seen the pain associated with said outcomes. Nepotism?

Francis Crick and James Watson earned the Nobel Prize (1962) for their groundbreaking and life changing research on DNA (1953). They could not have accomplished this feat without the crystallography data developed by the brilliant Rosalind Franklin. I say she should be awarded a Nobel Prize posthumously for her contributions to this effort.

Beware of using your credit card over the Internet for purchases. Companies obtaining your number often believe the card is theirs. They begin to charge your account and send you things you never ordered. Then you are encumbered with the ordeal of correcting the "mistake."

Be even more careful when purchasing domain names and websites from Internet hosting companies such as Verisign. They treat you like crap, and when you've had enough and decide to move on to another company, they hold your domain name hostage.

This happened to my earlier domain name (visionscreativeconsulting.com). After fighting with Verisign for several months to release my domain name, to no avail, I decided to move on anyway with a new domain name (horaciolewis.com). This was a painful, yet, less stressful decision; though I miss Visions Creative Consulting, a name which I have used for several years.

Reflecting on California's recall vote, I ask: Is movie acting a prerequisite for politics or vice versa?

In Delaware and the rest of the country, we continue to whine about the application of the "No Child Left Behind" Presidential education initiative and related local buffoonery. Let's instead go back to basics relying on teacher evaluation of students, school accreditation reports and PSAT/SAT data (See discussion below on Delaware's testing program).

I talk to myself because I am the best listener I know.

More comments later.


DISCUSSION #1

Delaware State Representative Wayne Smith, a principal sponsor of the neighborhood school law, was recently quoted as saying, "the law does not intentionally discriminate." The last time I saw Rep. Smith, we were on WILM Radio debating a proposed "English Only" law for the State of Delaware. Such a law, enacted in other parts of the country, in essence makes it illegal or objectionable to speak or conduct business in a language other than English. I was against the proposed law; he was one of its sponsors. This law is recognized as punitive to Latino citizens in particular.

Hence, I am not surprised that Mr. Smith would view his current legislative foray as not "intentionally" discriminatory. His law may not contain the words "intended to segregate" in it, but pleading ignorance to its impact or effect is no excuse to develop legislation that clearly ignores demographic data on Delaware neighborhoods. The law, plain and simple, was designed to discriminate when it was proposed, enacted, and now defended. I say kudos to school districts that understand this reality and seek to reverse it.

~~~~~~~

COMMENT: The neighborhood school law is suspect at best. The implementation of this law may promote yet another round of unneeded desegregation litigation.

QUESTION: Do you support diversity in our schools and State? If so, do you think this law will facilitate or hinder progress in this direction?
Do contact us with your reactions, comments and suggestions. Mil gracias.
Refer to publications page for sources.

DISCUSSION #2

If teachers and students are to be held accountable to Delaware Education State Standards, it is important to understand that students and teachers are engaged in a full scope of academic work beyond the reach of a mere State test which purports to evaluate an entire year's progress.

A preemptive State test is an insult to professional educators who work long hours with large classes at insulting wages. It is also punitive to students who come from different backgrounds and learn at their own pace and style. Clearly, our current State unreliable assessment measures which penalize fine schools and students are driven by gubernatorial politics and Department of Education inability to find productive use of its time. Indeed, the current DOE school ranking is meaningless since a fair amount of students did not take the State test seriously as it had no impact on their high school or college placement, graduation, promotion or grades. One student, for example, wrote the entire test in Spanish last year!

During the 2001-2002 school year, the test (DSTP--Delaware Testing Program) is expected to affect students in various ways. An "A" student, for example, with high SAT scores, may be held back or subjected to an "individual instruction plan (IIP)," extended day school, summer school or an inferior graduation diploma, if DSTP test scores are not pleasing to the DOE, regardless of how outstanding the student may otherwise be.

This travesty borders on the insane. Furthermore, superior schools, from which students are admitted to Brown and other top universities, are being labeled by the DOE as not meeting the grade or in "need of improvement." I say, let us get on with teaching and learning and stop playing the "DOE test game" which disrupts the educational process. Our only hope is that this too, like Madeline Hunter, et al., will pass.

If as many students are held back, for summer school, as is predicted, where will DOE find the teachers required to do their dirty work? Let us stop the charade and conduct summer school for those who truly need it. Teachers should only enlist for legitimate summer teaching and not for "making up" a test.

~~~~~~~

COMMENT: State tests are developed by bureaucrats at a desk top far removed from the reality of the day to day operations of the classroom.

QUESTION: Should not those who are closest to the teaching, learning and parenting process--in the local trenches--evaluate school and student achievement? And what ever happened to the notion of local control and site council management?
______________________________

Taken from "Quadrangulated Inequality."

Many of the concerns inspired by our inability to cope with differences in the workplace are repairable if there is a sense that management is committed to fairness and equity, and demonstrates this resolve by its very (modeled) behavior. My own experience with inequity in employment is a prime illustration of management's failure to comprehend how the most difficult of problems in the workplace can be easily resolved by active engaged listening and immediate pursuit of what's right, and to then make things right for those aggrieved.

Below is a model for reducing legal activity as well as unnecessary pain/suffering and taxpayer/personal financing in addressing the perpetration of unfair behaviors in the workplace. This model will help to create goodwill and tolerance/appreciation for similarities and differences.

1. Establish an External Redress Group (ERG) and, with said group (not affiliated with the agency), develop a non-discrimination/pro-equity policy and provide appropriate training to implement it.

2. With ERG, periodically (quarterly) visit agency heads and random employees (separately) to inspect, review and discuss agency practices/behaviors and make appropriate recommendations to management and policy makers for action. All visits should be unannounced.

3. Complaints/concerns must be addressed immediately by calling ERG for action.

4. ERG must convene all parties involved and hold them accountable for their actions via refereed discussions.

5. Issues must be openly discussed during normal workdays until they are resolved in a fair and equitable manner. Issues must be resolved within 24 hours. Strict confidentiality must be maintained at all times.

6. ERG may be appointed (with input from random & diverse employees) by an unbiased entity not involved with the targeted agency and issues acted upon.

7. ERG must be properly trained (e.g. skills development in cultural diversity, interpersonal relations, arbitration, race relations, gender equity, civil rights laws...) to do its job effectively.

8. Decisions reached by ERG (which must take no longer than 30 workdays of a registered complaint) are binding. Decisions may include the payment of funds up to $10,000 or any employment action (e.g. suspension, firing, promotion, demotion, and salary changes). All meetings with ERG are strictly confidential and complainants will be guaranteed protection against employer retaliation or harassment of any kind.
______________________________

***FREE***

You may obtain a free publication compliments of Barnes & Noble and the Anti-Defamation League entitled "101 Ways to Combat Prejudice," by requesting a copy from HORACIOLEWIS18@gmail.com
______________________________

"There is no such thing as a white person, they are beige." my son at age six
______________________________

You may contact HDLEWISENTERPRISES.COM FAIRNESS INSTITUTE by writing to horaciolewis18@gmail.com
Please use the links displayed to share your thoughts with us, to review other pages in this site and to obtain additional information on HORACIOLEWIS.COM FAIRNESS INSTITUTE: CONSULTING AND TRAINING FOR FAIR AND IMPROVED PRODUCTIVITY.

Las manos de un nuevo amanecer.
The hands of a new dawn.